Peter Kourzanov scripsit: > So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so > well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back > that for R7RS?
It's under WG1 ballot, and I think if it doesn't make WG1, it will very likely make WG2. There are several variants available besides the SRFI itself. It's easy to implement parameters portably in a non-threaded system, so the proposals are about how mutation (as opposed to rebinding, which is per-thread) interacts with threads. http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ParametersSnellPym defines parameters as thread-safe under mutation, whereas http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ImmutableParametersCowan excludes mutation. -- If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper] John Cowan once more, I will be downcoming http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and somebody will be outgoing. co...@ccil.org _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
