William D Clinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Both the R5RS and R6RS insist that procedures that are eqv? > behave the same. Distinct procedures that share the same > code are unlikely to behave the same.
This is true in general, but I think the assertion was that two procedures that do not need closures to run correctly, can only be observationally different or distinct if they have different code bodies. I am not seeing a fault in this reasoning off the top of my head. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
