It’s not TCO, it’s PITCH (proper implementation of tail calls) — there is no optimization going on :-)
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > > Quoting "https://github.com/vishesh/racketscript/blob/master/README.md": >> RacketScript doesn't support Racket features which are expensive, for >> example proper tail calls and continuations. > > Do you have plans to revist the tail call question within RacketScript? TCO > is essential to idiomatic Scheme, and (while Racket is not Scheme, and has > grown other noteworthy strengths, and people have less interest in learning > algorithm crafting than they used to) I think TCO still has a lot of merit, > and should not be discarded lightly. > > Not many people will mind if you discard first-class continuations, however. > :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
