> On Jan 25, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Philip McGrath <[email protected]> wrote: > > I took the steps you described and I no longer get the doubled program > contour, but I do get results like the screenshot of my experiment with > text:inline-overview-mixin I sent > earlier (maybe that's what the contour is supposed to look like now?). In > both cases, drawing the contour on top of the actual text seems to me to be > causing a problem: in, for example, line 219 of the following screenshot, the > overview covers up part of the program source, and I can't scroll to reveal > the covered part. In the example I sent earlier, auto-wrap is on, but > wrapping places text under the overview, and again it isn't possible to > scroll to uncover the text. > > Is this the way this is supposed to work now?
To answer only this part of the question: yes, I believe this is how this is supposed to work. I personally prefer the new setup, but I’m not actually a super-frequent user of the feature, so maybe my opinion is not the most important one. John Clements -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
