> On Jan 25, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Philip McGrath <phi...@philipmcgrath.com> wrote: > > I took the steps you described and I no longer get the doubled program > contour, but I do get results like the screenshot of my experiment with > text:inline-overview-mixin I sent > earlier (maybe that's what the contour is supposed to look like now?). In > both cases, drawing the contour on top of the actual text seems to me to be > causing a problem: in, for example, line 219 of the following screenshot, the > overview covers up part of the program source, and I can't scroll to reveal > the covered part. In the example I sent earlier, auto-wrap is on, but > wrapping places text under the overview, and again it isn't possible to > scroll to uncover the text. > > Is this the way this is supposed to work now?
To answer only this part of the question: yes, I believe this is how this is supposed to work. I personally prefer the new setup, but I’m not actually a super-frequent user of the feature, so maybe my opinion is not the most important one. John Clements -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
