0xdeadbeef;576588 Wrote: > That it still may please some people in some use cases doesn't mean that > it's the users' fault if it doesn't work adequately in most other cases. Or "That it still may please most people in most use cases doesn't mean that it's the user's fault if it doesn't work adequately in some other cases."
No, a failing network isn't necessarily the user's fault. I can't see that anybody has said that. 0xdeadbeef;576588 Wrote: > Before the most basic flaws are fixed, it's completely futile to claim > that any percentage of complaints is -not- based on the crappy > software. Because...? 0xdeadbeef;576588 Wrote: > So I guess it's time to abandon all hope and think of an alternative. I hear that 'Sonos' (http://www.sonos.com/Default.aspx?rdr=true&LangType=1053) users are generally pretty happy with their systems. You may want to check it out. Good luck to you. -- Soulkeeper -that is not dead which can eternal lie. and with strange aeons even death may die.- duet + boom + radio (+touch on the way) / wrt160n/dd-wrt / sbs 7.5.1 or higher/win7(32b)/avira free ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81889 _______________________________________________ Radio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/radio
