Soulkeeper;576589 Wrote: > Or "That it still may please most people in most use cases doesn't mean > that it's the user's fault if it doesn't work adequately in some other > cases." > > No, a failing network isn't necessarily the user's fault. I can't see > that anybody has said that. The post I quoted names "router, the network, WIFI interference, hard drive, computer running SbS, or music tags" as reasons for problems with the Radio. Indeed none of the major flaws is in any way related to any of these points. Besides, neither a crappy server side implementation (MYSB) nor a broken client side implementation is a "failing network".
Soulkeeper;576589 Wrote: > > Because...? > Should be obvious. If a car's engine is broken, it doesn't make sense to blame the road that it doesn't drive. Soulkeeper;576589 Wrote: > I hear that 'Sonos' > (http://www.sonos.com/Default.aspx?rdr=true&LangType=1053) users are > generally pretty happy with their systems. You may want to check it > out. Good luck to you. Also a futile reply, as Sonos doesn't even have a standalone bedside internet radio clock in its product range. -- 0xdeadbeef ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0xdeadbeef's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2287 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81889 _______________________________________________ Radio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/radio
