Glenn Davy wrote:
> Torm3nt wrote:
>> I'm not talking me specifically, but I know of other environments that 
>> hvae this issue. Clearly you have the perfect environment where you're 
>> given ample time to achieve all results ;)
> im a bit like an 'ex smoker' on this issue so sorry if comes on too 
> strong, but I'm gonna go out on a limb here and back what carlw said. i 
> _dont_ work in an ideal environment and have too often decided to leave 
> some/many tests out in order to meet an imposed deadline - resulting in 
> much more time lost later.    imho time spent writing tests  is an
> investement returning time gains later. ergo, writing tests is even  
> more  important  when  under  time constraints.  i think time saved in 
> browser, esp for a process intensive scenario pays for the time writing 
> tests. but real returns are with the problems caught and solved now and 
> not down the tack
This is a trade-off to be weighed by the business, as developers we need 
to be able to convince them that it is worthwhile (too much interest ;).

"Technical debt" isn't always a bad thing, just like normal debt [1].

I know I've worked on low value things that are potentially time 
consuming to test properly (usually legacy). Even when bugs crop up, I 
have found often it was still prudent to not have a thorough test suite 
(usually just a big integration test "does this not blow up").

So maybe I'm crap at testing. I get better at that on my own time or get 
the business to pay for some time for me to get better.

Xav

[1] Though normally it is

> 
> just my .02
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Carl Woodward <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     But how much time do you spend in the browser???
>>
>>     On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Torm3nt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>     > I am working at it, but the issue isn't with development - often
>>     it's with
>>     > management who don't want to give you the time ;)
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Carl Woodward
>>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>     >>
>>     >> If you tried testing everything, you would notice that it
>>     doesn't take
>>     >> much more time. Particularly once you learn the testing framework
>>     >> really well.
>>     >>
>>     >> I think that is the issue with testing, is that it isn't straight
>>     >> forward. You need to work at. I am working at it.
>>     >>
>>     >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Torm3nt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>     >> > That's not entirely true, especially in a client-driven
>>     management
>>     >> > environment.
>>     >> >
>>     >> > More people should use Agile =)
>>     >> >
>>     >> >
>>     >> >
>>     >> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Carl Woodward
>>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>>     >> > wrote:
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >> But you do have time...
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Enrico Teotti
>>     >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>>     >> >> wrote:
>>     >> >> >
>>     >> >> >> And test everything. EVERYTHING...
>>     >> >> > and if you don't have time to test everything I suggest to
>>     >> >> > prioritize:
>>     >> >> > 1) models
>>     >> >> > 2) the app flow with integration tests, stories
>>     (cucumbers?) or maybe
>>     >> >> > selenium
>>     >> >> > 3) spec helpers & controllers
>>     >> >> >
>>     >> >> > >
>>     >> >> >
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >> --
>>     >> >> Carl Woodward
>>     >> >> 0412218979
>>     >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >
>>     >> >
>>     >> > >
>>     >> >
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >> --
>>     >> Carl Woodward
>>     >> 0412218979
>>     >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Carl Woodward
>>     0412218979
>>     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> > 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to