Wonderfully clear...  given those facts.... it all sounds like a good idea,
and great initiative on the Jr Commanders part, and well thought out by him.
Sounds like he covered all the basis.  I too would have let them use the
Ranger equipment.

Kudo's to him.

Blessings,

Parson.

At 12:59 PM 10/1/00 -0500, Michael Wasmer wrote:
>In responce to this concern, I feel there is some facts that need to be
>brought out. First: This should have been taken to the Sr Commander, If
>there was some concern with this situation. Maybe all the questions
>could have been answered. Before it was aired and a lot of  wrong
>information  given to other readers.   So here are the answers: !. The
>Commander is a  Jr.Commander, 17 yrs old. 2. No it was not on the
>calendar, because it is not a RR campout.  And I, the Sr Commander , was
>asked weeks ago, if I had a problem with some of the boys going to his
>house and sleep over in his pop up trailer. This was in his back yard.
>3. There was no  RR equipment being used. But if they had asked, I would
>have been glad to let them!  4. The Permission slip explained to the
>parents that this was not a RR outing and went  in great detail about
>who was responsible , for accidents , ect. This was provided by the Jr
>Commander. (Which I am very proud that he took it upon himself to
>provide).  5. And to top this off , the young man went to the Pastor
>and got his permission before  hand.     I am very proud that this young
>man is willing to help these younger boys work on advancements and
>merits.  All these boys are friends, some are even in FCF together.    I
>would rather  they be doing this , than some possible mischief.  I hope
>this clears things  up!
>Michael W Wasmer                                              Sr
>Cammander                                                    Out post 31
>Belton Mo


_______
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Eat the hay & spit out the sticks! - A#1's mule"     RTKB&G4JC!
 http://rangernet.org    Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to