Y'all,
Hey there if I had down flame I apologize. See I thought I put on
the subject Question-help. Not Cross-dressing. So if this is not
a good subject or something. I do apologize from the bottom of my heart. Y'all have
a great day. If your reading this, please be in prayer. That today is the last day
for the kids kruzade. God Bless
John
---
John Evans
Maryville AG
" " Royal Rangers
Opost 7th
IL
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:19:35 Soaring Golden Eagle wrote:
>No flame throwers necessary...
>I think what we have, here, is a bad case of religion, even in Pentecostal
>circles. By "religion," I mean a set of rituals, rules, and traditions by
>which people seek to prove themselves holy -- the kind of thing that
>irritated Jesus and got Him angry when He was walking the earth with us. It
>is an easy trap to fall into when you focus on one verse, and forget about
>whole chapters in the Bible on love and grace.
>
>In any case, John's original question concerns a verse that, if read
>plainly, is a prohibition of the sexual perversion known as cross-dressing
>(i. e. putting a bra on a man). I see nothing in there prohibiting slacks
>on women or kilts on Scottish men.
>
>At 09:20 PM 3/25/99 -0700, Burns, Andy wrote:
>...
>>There are many single verses in the Bible upon which the numerous doctrines
>>and faiths have been founded as 'gospel', but when taken out of context,
>>they take on a whole new meaning other than that for which they were
>>included in scripture.
>...
>>I've been in services where ladies by the door stapled paper around girls
>>dresses on their way in, in order to make them 'proper' ladies... with no
>>leg showing.
>...
>>There are some in both camps (A/G and Oneness) who feel I must choose a
>>'side'... for those, I pray. I am on the Lord's side... whether you call
>>him Master, Savior, Jesus, Father, etc. One Savior, One Lord.
>>
>>"Come to me, all who are thirsty and are heavy laden, and I will give you
>>rest"
>>"Call upon the name of the Lord and you'll be saved"
>...
>>
>>"Study to show thyself approved, a workman that needeth not be ashamed...
>>RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH"
>>
>>Selah,
>>
>>Andy.
>>
>>PS: For you with flame throwers in hand... "You may fire when ready
>>Gridley"
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John I Evans [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 7:06 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John I Evans; Mark Owens
>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: [RR] Cross-dressing?
>>>
>>> Y'all,
>>> Ah I see thanks for the help. I
>>>
>>> will send an update on the kids kruzade.
>>> John
>>> ---
>>> John Evans
>>> Maryville AG
>>> " " Royal Rangers
>>> Opost 7th
>>> IL
>>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:34:37 Mark Owens wrote:
>>> >I believe that the Assemblies believe that women should dress modestly.
>>> I
>>> >have seen women in pants. They don't look like men at all. And the
>>> clothes
>>> >they wear (pants) aren't men's pants. Thank God He made everything
>>> >beautiful. I have also seen these same women (UPC's) wearing dresses
>>> while
>>> >they work in the yard. When the breeze blew in I had to turn the other
>>> way.
>>> >
>>> >Mark Owens
>>> >Alabama District Communication Specialist
>>> >(That a fancy way of being Steve Lolley's gopher)
>>> >
>>> >----- Original Message -----
>>> >From: John I Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 5:43 PM
>>> >Subject: [RR] Cross-dressing?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Y'all,
>>> >>
>>> >> I need help for that see okay. Deut 22:5
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> saids that" A woman must not wear guys clothes, nor a
>>> >> man wear women clothes. Okay see United Penecost
>>> >> Church belives ladies can't wear pants at all okay.
>>> >> They must wear dresses. What does AG belive on this?
>>> >> John
>
>
CCNmail for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.ccnmail.com
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Eat the hay & spit out the sticks!" RTKB&G4JC!
Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rangernet.org
