> Razor is interfering with the free speech rights of the Electronic > Frontier Foundation and the rights of 30,000 subscribers.
No it's not. Some of those 30,000 subscribers are choosing to use Razor in a manner that prevents them -- the subscriber -- from receiving your mail. They, the subscribers, are choosing not to listen to you. Stop claiming that Razor is "censoring" you. On Feb. 22, you said: > If I'm sending a newsletter to 30,000 people and the ISPs - who I have > no control over - or the users have their system rely on the accuracy > of Razor - then my newsletter gets censored because it is either > blocked or it is classified in a manner that it ends up in a junk mail > folder that is never read. This is not censoring, because (as you, yourself point out) it's the *users* -- the intended recipients -- who are "censoring". Supposing that you send me snail mail and, upon receipt, I see that the sender is "EFF" and decide to throw it away, is that censorship? If I call my friend who says "A bunch of my other friends got that too, and they didn't want it" and I throw it away, is that censorship? --Will ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
