"Paul Oehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as I can tell, there is no perfect answer. The Spam problem is a very hard > one. All Spam identification systems have > problems, and some legitimate mail will be always be marked as spam. That is why I > like the Spamassassin method of only > tagging messages as likely-to-be-spam, which can later be reviewed by the recipient.
In what way is the Razor method any different? Like Spamassassin (which I also use and which uses Razor2 as one of the indications of spam) it just marks spam which the user can review. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
