On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:19:42PM -0800, Marc Perkel said: > > Very possible? No more than a guess. Can Razor confirm that is the reason?
Unnecessary. If it's happened even once, EFFector is spam. Several people have told you it's happened. That thud you hear is the clue-by-four striking your skull. > Razor labeled Effector as spam. I merely ask why. And I'm not asking for > you to guess. Wrong. Razor didn't label anybody as spam. A Razor user exercised his free speech right to label it as spam. Razor merely communicated his opinion to it's subscribers. His speech is communicated anonymously. Feel free to try to have the secret police intimidate their way past his privacy, if that's EFF policy now. > If Razor can show me that list administration caused the problem, I will > be happy to fix it. Razor doesn't care if you fix. Razor subscribers might, but if not, we'll be happy to continue to see you labeled as spammers, because you're obviously unrepentant spammers, which are the worst kind. > newsletter to be flagged as spam. We were given the opportunity to > correct the problem before seeing any consequences. But here we are And yet, you've chosen not to. Get enough complaints to Spamcop and they'll stop delisting you. -- Shawn McMahon | Imagine people who are just subscribing coming Episode IV Consulting | onto this thread and deciding that the entire System Administrator | OpenBSD community is full of hostile elitists. and all-around nice guy | - David Riley
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
