Marc Perkel wrote:
> 
> I use Razor myself as part of spam assassin and it does a good job 
> generally when it comes to real spam. But when it comes to free speech 
> newsletters it does a very poor job.

Why aren't you whitelisting your newsletters?  You subscribed to them
so I assume you want to receive them.  Why are you even checking them
with razor?

Filing all mail to /dev/null does a good job generally when it comes
to real spam.  But when it comes to non-spam filing to /dev/null does
a very poor job.

Why do you keep emphasizing that your newsletters are "free speech
newsletters" instead of just newsletters?  Does that give you 

> From what I see it looks like Razor is a threat to free speech in
> it's current form.

If the current form of free speech is spam/UBE then yes.

Please stop trolling.

Bob

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to