John says:
Our stated policy is that antispam measures' first goal should be to deliver every non-spam message to its destination. A particular ramification of that is that if 26,000 EFFector subscribers ASKED to get a message, and three did not, then delivery to that 26,000 should NEVER be interrupted or blocked. I.e. the same message can be "spam" to one person, and a desired communication to another. A blocking measure which cannot tell WITH RESPECT TO A PARTICULAR RECIPIENT whether a message is "spam" or "desired" should never block it.
Here's that micro-management demand from: Adam Goryachev:
>> I therefore formally request that the EFF show the public verifiable >> evidence of each and every member of their newsletter having >> requested to be on their mailing list. If you can't demonstrate that >> EFF has verified every subscription address then the fault is with >> the EFF and it should be blacklisted by anyone and everyone, and the >> EFF is irresponsible. I am not interested in guesses and theories >> that they "might" have subscribed themselves because they entered >> some public knowledge data. I want to see the evidence.
I suggest that our response to this particular demand should be a hearty "fuck you".
John
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
