On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:05:10PM -0800, Marc Perkel elucidated: > One of our board members - John Gillmore - (If you've heard of the "alt" > news groups - John started alt and is one of the founders of EFF.) - > > John says: > > Our stated policy is that antispam measures' first goal should be to > deliver every non-spam message to its destination. A particular > ramification of that is that if 26,000 EFFector subscribers ASKED to > get a message, and three did not, then delivery to that 26,000 should > NEVER be interrupted or blocked. I.e. the same message can be "spam" > to one person, and a desired communication to another. A blocking > measure which cannot tell WITH RESPECT TO A PARTICULAR RECIPIENT > whether a message is "spam" or "desired" should never block it. >
Well, despite your protestation Marc... and me being on that is very sympathetic to EFF's cause on a whole (I've been a member, though my membership may have lapsed). I'm not going to stop using razor, I'm not going to raise my spamassassin score above 5.0. And I think a lot of people share my opinion. So I think the thing is, you're going to have to learn how to deal with. EFF is going to have to work a little bit smarter. I think the Razor community has the edge in this debate. Sometimes the world ain't fair, deal with it. -- Dale Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] /.-) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
