On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > One of our board members - John Gillmore - (If you've heard of the "alt" > news groups - John started alt and is one of the founders of EFF.) -
That's nothing, I invented pants. > > John says: > > Our stated policy is that antispam measures' first goal should be to > deliver every non-spam message to its destination. A particular > ramification of that is that if 26,000 EFFector subscribers ASKED to > get a message, and three did not, then delivery to that 26,000 should > NEVER be interrupted or blocked. I.e. the same message can be "spam" > to one person, and a desired communication to another. A blocking > measure which cannot tell WITH RESPECT TO A PARTICULAR RECIPIENT > whether a message is "spam" or "desired" should never block it. > OK, Razor can whitelist. So the desired goal has been accomplished. Bye now. > Here's that micro-management demand from: Adam Goryachev: <snip> > > I suggest that our response to this particular demand should be a > hearty "fuck you". > And yet you still think that Razor should be forced to tell you who, what, where and why someone thought you were spam? Fuck you right back, and the aging hippie you rode in on. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
