On Monday 21 August 2006 01:16, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: > But all this involves only the local bayesian database. I would be quite > reluctant to add reporting to external db like razor without a careful > scrutiny by the sysmen, and I do not think they'll have time for it.
I'm not sure its warranted to have yet another person check mail that is about to be reported to Razor. You are correct, no one has time for this. Training you local bayes is generally as effective as razor - especialy for first-issue spam (first of a fresh batch, like every monday). Razor needs somebody to report it before it flags it as spam, bayes can figure that out by itself. That being said, if Razor says its spam it goes straight to /dev/null in my shop. > So the only thing I'd like to be sure is whether amavisd-new is not > implicitly attempting razor reporting on our behalf. It does not report. I don't think it can be made to do so without quite a bit of hacking. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpIR8E2qHSTv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
