Good afternoon Dan, We went from 7.1 to 8.0. And the answer is: This would never have run on a pre-version 8 system as the database exceeded 2 gigs! I recommend V8 highly. It's totally stable and very high performance and functionality. It would be very hard to believe that Razzak could ever do a release better than this one. While I'm sure he's busy working on that challenge, this is the best release since I came on board in 1986. :) I can't tell you anything about V9 but I'm a believer in V8.
Scott Sherer -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Goldberg Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:06 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: V8 super performance Did you run 7.6 previously?? If so, does V8 have faster performance?? Also, if you upgraded from 7.6, how hard was the upgrade. I am on the fence of upgrading or waiting until 9.0 comes out. Dan Goldberg -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Sherer Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:13 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - V8 super performance Hello everyone, We're users of Version 8 of Rbase for Windows. We had a unique and positive experience yesterday that I thought I would share. One of our suppliers sent a file to us for import into Rbase. What we didn't know was that the file was 13.5 million records. Using the "load table from filename as formatted" command, the load took approximatey five minutes and the rx2 file grew to about 4 gigabytes. There were no issues and access performance after the load was quick, as expected. Nice job Rbase! Scott Sherer Technical Enterprises --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
