Dan,
We came back to R:Base with 7.5 to do our own databases. Moved to
TurboV8 when we realized the amount of data we would eventually collect
would get pretty big and 8 had more capabilities. A huge plus was the
long names for columns. Just letting people read real words for a column
name and not a cryptic summary, like our previous database used, really
helped our behind the scene people learn their way around. For a few
extra bucks, the entire package seemed well worth it. 

Conversions have been easy. Just follow the directions. 8 has been great
for us. The system is very stable, works well, and speed has been very
fast on our LAN which includes some dog machines.  The only down side we
have seen (and it is a minor one) is when we are editing a form with
many items (particularly when moving those items around on a 512
machine), we can run out of memory resources. That entire issue goes
away by simply saving regularly. I'd recommend upgrading. No regrets on
our part.     

Tom Frederick
Elm City Center
1314 W Walnut
Jacksonville, IL  62650
Off - 217-245-9504
Fax - 217-245-2350
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - www.elmcity.org
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Goldberg
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:06 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: V8 super performance

Did you run 7.6 previously?? If so, does V8 have faster performance??

Also, if you upgraded from 7.6, how hard was the upgrade.

I am on the fence of upgrading or waiting until 9.0 comes out.

Dan Goldberg 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Sherer
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:13 AM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - V8 super performance

Hello everyone,

We're users of Version 8 of Rbase for Windows.  We had a unique and
positive
experience yesterday that I thought I would share.  One of our suppliers
sent a file to us for import into Rbase.  What we didn't know was that
the
file was 13.5 million records.  Using the "load table from filename as
formatted" command, the load took approximatey five minutes and the rx2
file
grew to about 4 gigabytes.  There were no issues and access performance
after the load was quick, as expected.  Nice job Rbase!

Scott Sherer
Technical Enterprises


Reply via email to