Hi James
I agree with David , R:BASE needs to be client server if it is to gain
market share.
Corporates want client server.
Is a big re-write ?
Regards
Victor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of David Ballantyne
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2001 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BASE Web Front End
>
>
> Hi James
>
> . Is R:Base for Linux going to be client-server database? MySQL is.
>
> This is definitely a question for RBTI...
>
> I asked Microrim for many years to C/S the product. They even
> announced it
> a couple of times in the early-mid 90's, yet nothing ever came of
> it. This
> was despite the fact that there were many internal Microrim claims at the
> time, that the job was not huge as a large chunk of the source
> code already
> existed in the (now very dead) Vanguard product. (mmmm - perhaps
> there was
> much more work in the job than Microrim 1st thought). In my
> oppinion, this
> is still one of the biggest enhancement issues that needs to be addressed.
>
> Since all (previous) R:BASE products came from the same code base (and I
> would assume this is still the case), If R:BASE for Linux were to become a
> C/S product, then the Win and DOS products would be likely to
> become C/S by
> nature.
>
> Perhaps Razzak could shed some more light for us all on the C/S issue.
>
> Kindest Regards
>
>
>
> David Ballantyne
>
>
