On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Darren Stone <dst...@bitmason.com> wrote:
> Does > it make sense that a TA double would need a longer spindle than I'm > currently using for a Sugino triple? In the current and rather weird jargon term: "Absolutely." I don't have much experience with cranks built after, say, 1990, but I do have a little, and I would guess that a modern crank might well have a higher Q than a Cyclotourist triple on the same frame even though the Cyclotourist triple might use a spindle that is as much as 30 mm longer than that for the modern crank. I got a Q of 160 with a custom 145 Phil and a Cyclotourist triple. Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM Professional Resumes. Contact resumespecialt...@gmail.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
