Works for me... I prefer the 175's. I feel like I climb better with a longer crankarm. I'm a little concerned about Q factor though. I prefer something a little wider. ~Mike~
On Aug 2, 4:33 pm, pruckelshaus <pruckelsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree completely. No 172.5 makes it a non-starter for me, otherwise > I would be very interested in a pair. I respect Chris for what he's > doing for the Riv/VO/etc. aspect of the industry, but there are times > when he's wrong, and his stance on 172.5's is one of those times. > > On Aug 2, 6:48 pm, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Those Gran Cru cranks are slick and much more retro in look. Too bad > > for me that Chris K insists I can't tell the difference between > > 172.5mm and 170. They should be available any day now. 46/30 is > > going to be the right thing for a lot of things. > > > On Aug- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
