I'll drop it. It's probably my ex-retail guilt complex wanting to give Rivendell the benefit of the doubt. If Rivendell wants to give the rider the benefit of the doubt, I've got no reason to be upset about it. They've been kind to me before, too. I shouldn't be bummed at them being kind to someone else.
On Friday, January 18, 2013 12:50:16 PM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, William <tape...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Oh, I thought you were joking around since I said 200%. > > > > Care to share your theory? I'm apparently not smart enough to conceive > a > > way that this could possibly be a defective frame. > > It *could* be defectively brittle metal, such that it snapped under a > teeny tiny insult that you'd barely notice. I'd say that was > vanishingly unlikely, but I can conceive it. > > -- > -- Anne Paulson > > My hovercraft is full of eels > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/6UdqUb1lakAJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
