On 11/12/2013 02:34 PM, Garth wrote:
Pretty clear by any stretch of the imagination ...lol. . Much taller than average ST height and_taller than the top of the Head Tube_.(I'm not referring to the top of the uncut steering tube)
That is hardly a cut-down head tube. In fact, it's a rather large head tube extension. And after all, this is a sloper, not a level top tube bike, right? Hold that frame at even a slight angle and it looks as though the top of the seat tube comes right to where the top of the head tube sits. Not exactly what I'd call *well lower*. Here's that same image rotated 3 degrees, so that the top tube slopes upwards:
with a horizontal line connecting the top of the seat tube with the top of the head tube extension. Now where's that huge disparity?
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:26:00 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 11/12/2013 02:08 PM, Garth wrote:They've simply made the seat tube overly long, but the *_top ofthe head tube_* itself is well*_lower than the top of the ST_*. If you like lower bars, that'll be great. If you want higher barswithout lots of spacers or extenders , not so great.That does not look like what you are describing. --You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
<<inline: soma_grandrando_framefork_ivory2014_1_1000-370x300.jpg>>
