Steve .... I say this with light heart .... You're missing the point I made. It's not that it does not "have" a liberal HT extension. The point I made was that relative to the ST top , the frame appears to have *less *ST-HT differential height , making it's no better, if not worse than a "classic" level TT frame with no HT extension. Most bike are a "plus" in this differential , meaning the top of the HT is higher than the top of the ST. Even a "classic" road frame has some "plus". This appears to have "minus", and that I do find strikingly odd. Hence, the "track bike" reference, where this "may" be a good quality.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
