Opps. Ment the M109 Howitzer. :P
----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Mangus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:33:50 PM Subject: [TANKS] Re: More Types Of Vehicles And Battlefield I was wondering the same thing. A M105 self propelled howitzer is an artillery piece. It wouldn't do well as a tank due to next to nothing armor. Hmm ... what if self propelled artillery pieces had to be stopped (not moving) to fire? While moving, they can be taken out just like a tank and cannot fire. While stopped, they have artillery men deployed and can fire at other assets. That might be a good compromise between self propelled and artillery. Mike M ----- Original Message ---- From: Clark Ward Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:46:56 PM Subject: [TANKS] Re: More Types Of Vehicles And Battlefield If it's tracked and has a gun, I'd say it's classified as a tank. On 9/30/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What would an artillery tank classify as. > > > -- _______ / |O| \ Clark in Georgia ###=======### USMC M60A1 ###=======### KI4GYT ### ### --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
