Wikipedia states that the Panzer II had 80mm of armor, so it clearly
deserves a defensive rating of 4. The rules were changed a very long
time ago to allow 1:6 scale vehicles, so it's clearly a legal size.
Why do you consider it a "rule beater" ... because the Panzer II existed
in real life or because John and Paul successfully crammed everything
required into a tiny space to make it work well?
Will you still consider it a "rule beater" if we accept Derek's proposal
and give all tanks 40/4 ratings?
On 12/18/2013 1:35 AM, TyngTech wrote:
It's no secret I consider the current Panzer II's a rule beater,
particularly built to 1:6 scale. I also realize that a considerable
amount of time and effort went into developing these tanks under the
assumption of a 4 point rating so I'm all for grand-fathering them as
heavy's if John and Paul so desire. If the ratings proposal is adopted
and new battlers show up with new-build 3 point lights, I'd hope John
and Paul would consider dropping a point during the battle for the sake
of sportsmanship.
--
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
