Current LC-PCC PS on Related Manifestations, RDA 27.1: "The word "reproduction" is being used in its broadest sense ..."
and "When the decision has been made to create a separate record for the reproduction, generally follow the guidelines below for giving MARC 775 and MARC 776 fields. The guidelines do not apply when the "single-record" or "provider neutral" technique is being used." In such an environment I would emphasize 775 and 776 in the displays so that people can better understand the relationship, and not worry that they would see the publisher of the original twice as it would only be entered once in the 775 or 776. Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library > -----Original Message----- > From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: September-26-13 4:38 PM > To: Brenndorfer, Thomas > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA local printouts > > Thomas quoted: > > "When a facsimile or reproduction has a publication statement or statements > relating to the original manifestation as well as to the facsimile or > reproduction, record the publication statement or statements relating to the > facsimile or reproduction. Record any publication statement relating to the > original as a publication statement of a related manifestation." > > Try selling that to the provider neutral e-book folk. > > We have repeating 264 with indicators. There is no excuse not to have the > content relevant information needed by patrons in a 264. > > An e-book provided by an aggregator, and a print-out from an electronic > publication, both have publishers. The publishers are not the aggregator or > printer. These are not reproductions in the sense that facsimiles are > reproductions. > > > __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected]) > {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ > ___} |__ > \__________________________________________________________ > > > >
