Stupid question: What use would cfproperty tags be in the record? No instance data is exposed publicly, only via getters/setters.
Doug -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Corfield Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Reactor and Flex Data Services On 3/24/06, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I created a custom assembler, nothing more than a cfc with those 4 methods. > inside each I use reactor factory & objects to do the similiar operations. > I didn't use the records since the <cfproperty /> was inside the To's and not in the Records Hmm, thinking about it, the FDS / assembler mechanism might not be able to create appropriate record objects so maybe using the underlying gateway / dao / to is the "right" way to handle this, even tho' it's a bit ugly... How are you handling sync(), exactly? Could you post your assembler CFC? -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
