proposal 3:
3. . = SPLICE = GROUP, remove SPLICE-at-the-eol rule (this helps
justify removing the SPLICE-at-the-eol: since \ at the eol has an
existing meaning in other languages, we avoid it. Incidentally, "."
has a meaning in general western written languages: it ends sentences.
So we could justify using it to mean "end the expression so far and
start a new expression", which is one interpretation of the
SPLICE-inline rule.)
let
.
a b
c d
e
if
cond foo . expr parm
cond bar . expr parm2
. expr parm3
define do-it-3()
call 1 . call 2 . call 3
foo
:foo-stuff . exp1()
:bar-stuff . call the function
foo
:foo-stuff
. exp1()
:bar-stuff
. call the function
NB: this unfortunately conflicts with the ". as indentation whitespace
LOL AHM IN UR WHITESPACE BEING INDENTZ" proposal. Yes, dwheeler was
trolling us about it. But it's still.... interesting.
Sincerely,
AmkG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
