On 2/19/06, Michael Krugman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there RB2006r1 users who have had this problem and found the > reason for it?
I'm sure it's not our fault, nor yours. > Are there things I can do to try to improve things? That appears out of our control as well. We've reported it and that's all we can do, it seems. (rant follows) I've seen RB grow bigger and slower ever since its beginnings. I only found one of them justifiable: When the debugging procedure switched from running the debugged app in the IDE's process to a separate process. This improved debugging reliability but did necessitate building the app as a executable file and launching it. This made the debug process much slower, but it gave us better debugging in return. All the other things, though, such as the slow 200x IDE (due to it being written in the slower RB code now), the slower compiler and the huge generated apps are all under direct control of RS and could all be avoided if more attention would be paid to it. But it didn't ever happen, and I'm not expecting it to change much unless a much bigger crowd gets upset and tells RS to do something about this situation. (I actually had a talk with Geoff a few years ago when I offered to write a 3rd party optimizing linker to make the apps substantially smaller - I needed some support from RB for this, though, but Geoff denied my request, claiming that RB would solve this in a few months anyways. Can't imagine what he had in mind, because I've never seen the size get smaller the way I had intended) Thomas _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
