On Mar 18, 2006, at 8:59 , Joseph J. Strout wrote:

At 11:32 AM -0800 3/18/06, philbond wrote:

I have been reading some very disturbing things about RB 2006 and wondered
if those negative comments are those of a noisy few or the general
consensus.

A noisy few. Almost everybody I've run into loves RB2006; it's a huge improvement over previous versions.

Best,
- Joe



There are some missing things in RB2005/2006 that make the workflow slower.

Yesterday I should add 3 new 'code strings' in three events in about 20 Floating windows. To be sure i don't forgotten some, I opened all Floating windows and start inserting (write by hand) the code.

The result was chaotic: http://www.okraft.nu/seedit/tmp/rbtabbar.png
To get this to work you need an 32" Wide Screen.
I have to use Text Edit to copy and paste the code.

In RB5.x.x I have all my windows in the Window menu.
I could collapse the windows and bring it back fix the code and close the window to be sure it was fixed, And in RB 5.x.x I could create my own 'temporary code snippets' in the Extra menu.
You could also use two or more screens, to arrange your palettes.

I use RB 5.5.5 to create and test the mostly of the code, only compiling in RB2005/2006.
I do so because it is much faster to work this way.
The compiled code is faster in RB2005/2006.

//////////////////////////
I think i found an bug in RB2006...
I have so long i used RB2005/2006 some problems with my own application, when I opened the
Carbon Color Palette I sometimes get an crash.

Yesterday I begin to add some color constants in the RB IDE, and get the crash very often.
Any others that have the same?? (OS X 10.4.5)

/////////////////////////

Sven E Olsson

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to