On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Stefan wrote:
Few people use RB for compiler writing. Thus, writing a compiler in RB
doesn't prove anything what people do.
REAL isnt wrigin the compiler in RB; it's still C++
The IDE is in RB
Being able to write the RB IDE in RB says something about what
kinds of things are possible.
Well, yes, compilers ;-)
They aren't writing the compiler in RB (yet)
Just the IDE
And, I'd suspect that at some point a compiler could be built in
RB for RB.
Sure, it's turing strong...
RB is being used o write the RB IDE, but it's not, from what I
know, the 2006 IDE that they are using.
It will be a big step forward when they move to using the current
release version to write the next version.
At that point the fully decoupled from the efforts or solution
open-source or commercial projects reached.
I might be totally wrong. And, yes, I didn't aimed to start a new
flame-war.
Not a flame war.
REAL is writing the RB IDE in RB
And it should be a good item to tackle in RB
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
