Hi Norman, the List,
can we, after one year and a half, quantify why it was good to have an
IDE developed with REALbasic ?
I mean, after time, not in general ("It is good generally speaking
that...").
Cheers,
Emile
PS: why is it important to use the product to develop the product - and
get in mind everyday facts, not general ideas - ?
For example, in Linux, the PushButton text is taller than the button
height, FOR OUR APPLICATIONS. As a matter of counter-example, in the
Linux IDE, this is also true. So why is it important for us that REAL
Software use REALbasic to develop REALbasic ?
Subject: Re: How much of RB2006 is now written in RB itself?
From: Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:56:43 -0600
On Jul 16, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Stefan wrote:
We don't ask for artificial limits, just good use of resources. RB
is not a compiler-writing
tool. The fact, that you write certain translators is ok - but the
masses don't
do this.
"The masses" don't write compilers in any language.
Compiler developers are a small percentage of the overall developer
community in any platform or language.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
