Change theme. RB on linux doesn't seem to be 100% theme aware.
Trausti
On 17.7.2006, at 08:48, Emile Schwarz wrote:
Hi Norman, the List,
can we, after one year and a half, quantify why it was good to have
an IDE developed with REALbasic ?
I mean, after time, not in general ("It is good generally speaking
that...").
Cheers,
Emile
PS: why is it important to use the product to develop the product -
and get in mind everyday facts, not general ideas - ?
For example, in Linux, the PushButton text is taller than the
button height, FOR OUR APPLICATIONS. As a matter of counter-
example, in the Linux IDE, this is also true. So why is it
important for us that REAL Software use REALbasic to develop
REALbasic ?
Subject: Re: How much of RB2006 is now written in RB itself?
From: Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:56:43 -0600
On Jul 16, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Stefan wrote:
We don't ask for artificial limits, just good use of resources.
RB is not a compiler-writing
tool. The fact, that you write certain translators is ok - but
the masses don't
do this.
"The masses" don't write compilers in any language.
Compiler developers are a small percentage of the overall
developer community in any platform or language.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
