I don't agree entirely. I agree that we need far more bug fixes,
rather than half-baked features. But simply devoting 3 and 4 to fixes
isn't the right solution.
RS claims that R2 was mostly a bug-only release. But it was not a bug-
only development cycle. In fact, much time was devoted to new
features that were not in the release. This is, in essence, wasted
time in my opinion. Instead of working on those features, I would
have rather RS work on fixes. R2, for my uses, is the same as R3.
Because of the lack of new features, and no fixes that help my
situation, it's provided me no benefit as of yet.
Aw well. We're beating a dead horse, and I don't think it will really
get us anywhere. RS needs new features to keep the marketing
department happy, and marketing needs them to help keep the company
making money.
--
Thom McGrath
The ZAZ Studios
<http://www.thezaz.com/> AIM: thezazstudios
On Jul 21, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Carlos M wrote:
This would allow RS to concentrate at least two times per year to ONLY
fix bugs and improve optimization. RS should fix also bugs with one or
few 'votes'.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
