On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Thom McGrath wrote:
I don't agree entirely. I agree that we need far more bug fixes,
rather than half-baked features. But simply devoting 3 and 4 to
fixes isn't the right solution.
RS claims that R2 was mostly a bug-only release. But it was not a
bug-only development cycle. In fact, much time was devoted to new
features that were not in the release. This is, in essence, wasted
time in my opinion. Instead of working on those features, I would
have rather RS work on fixes. R2, for my uses, is the same as R3.
Because of the lack of new features, and no fixes that help my
situation, it's provided me no benefit as of yet.
I mentioned in the Getting Started list that I would like to see a
big release within approximately 90 days, and then then a RAPID
release about 3 to 4 weeks later which does not include any
significant new features. I admit that I was hoping that the rapid
release would be more rapid.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
