I posted a request to swap the New Window and New Project command keys:

"
To match Finder behaviour and reflect that New Window will be chosen much more often than New Project, the command-key for File - New Window should be changed to Command-N.
"

the RS response was something I found frankly unbelievable:

"It is doubtful that this will change as it would break a ton of muscle memory and provide no real benefit. There are much easier ways to get a new window (that are more useful), so that menu item is there more for exploration."

I've added a comment to remind them of the hole in their argument:
"In response to your review, you are ALREADY BREAKING MUSCLE MEMORY from the Finder, where I use New Window via command-N all the time, far more often than I do in REALbasic.

In the few days of using REALbasic I have already created several inadvertent New Folders in the Finder because you are corrupting my muscle memory and I am starting to do command-shift-N there as well!
"

If they think the menu items are there for exploration then why do they care about muscle memory?

How often do you create new projects vs using the New Window command?

It feels a bit like the Everything-in-one-tabbed-window Mafia who have reluctantly accepted certain changes, like New Window, still don't take the idea of alternate working styles very seriously, a slightly-frivolous interpretation given a bit of weight by the number of bugs I've already experienced in multi-window synchronisation ;-)

If you too find this annoying, please comment or vote.

http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=oziskjnx

You know, I have a really funny feeling that I pointed this out to them in the early alpha testing of the original RB2005 IDE and got told it was inappropriate to comment on UI issues at that time, sigh.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to