for me it's not even the money any more: I'd GLADLY accept a quarterly release with NO new features, but with most outstanding bugs fixed. I have wasted enormous amounts of time chasing/working around compiler bugs (as if my own bugs aren't enough to keep me busy!).
I'm sure 99% of folks on this list would concur. How about we file a FR as follows: for 2007r3 we want not a single new feature over r2, but all bugs with more than 2 votes fixed. I'm not being facetious. Cheers, Peter. On 4/9/07, Kirk Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But as far as RS is concerned the solution is easy: Just send us > more money to renew your subscription and maybe we'll fix it in a > future release. > > > Kirk > > > On Apr 9, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Peter K. Stys wrote: > > > This does not build confidence does it. > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter K. Stys, MD Professor of Medicine(Neurology), Senior Scientist Ottawa Health Research Institute, Div. of Neuroscience Ottawa Hospital / University of Ottawa Ontario, CANADA tel: (613)761-5444 fax: (613)761-5330 http://www.ohri.ca/profiles/stys.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
