Manolo R.G. wrote: > But perhaps Dario is right... > well we tried it :) if you try using a virtual camera driver and capture a 800x600 (or worse 1024x768) you will clearly see that: 1) flash player suffers an high cpu usage in order to encode the video 2) you need a HUGE bandwidth because it sends the whole frame (screen) on each keyframe. 3) video quality is horrible because the encoding scheme (keyframes+difference frames, jpeg encoded) is not suitable to this kind of stream
there may be much more... but i don't remeber it now (it has been more than 1 year ago). So, as far as we know, this is not the way to achieve screensharing. (we don't know any good one, with flash) Dario De Agostini _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
