-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Edward Dekkers wrote:
>Just re-reading this I realise it sounds a bit harsh, and that is not my >intention. I don't think there's anything harsh about it, but it sounds like we're talking about two different issues. Nobody's arguing that DHCP should be banished -- just that it's counterproductive to use it for _resource servers_, which need to be reachable at the same address consistently, both for convenience and security. DHCP is for _clients_. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPLOcyL9BpdPKTBGtEQK14QCfdZgDpHsGIL3uokROSFRLBnOeJF8Anj79 vALASL0/3en/nQZPGA/5xHas =Umv1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
