If you were starting a team and had to pick one retired Red Sox leftfielder 
(and say Ted Williams wasn't available because his head was in a freezer)an it 
is Rice, hands down.  Agree or not?



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Jan 12 18:14:25 2009
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm

Different days.

Yaz played during the very low ERA days.  The year after his triple crown was 
1968.  And read this from Wikipedia:

“Yastrzemski's .301 mark in "The Year of the Pitcher" is the lowest average of 
any batting champion in major league history; however, he was the only hitter 
in the American League to hit .300 for that season against such formidable 
pitching”

 

That’s why you can’t compare stats in different times.

Your argument means nothing.

Jim Rice didn’t debut ‘til ’75, right?

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of William Marino
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm

 

Never even sure why it was a debate about Rice.  Compared to Yaz.  Rice:  Life 
time average: .298.  HR: 382 in 12 seasons (an average of 32 per season).  Yaz: 
Life time average: .285.  HR 452 in 23 seasons (an average of 19 per season).  
Rice was a better hitter and had much more power.  Yes, Yaz won the Triple 
Crown and was an excellent defender (better at first base than in left field), 
but it always struck me that Yza got too much credit for longevity and Rice got 
too much slack for the lack of it.  In his day, Rice was simply one of the most 
feared hitters in both leagues.  If Yaz belongs in the HOF, Rice does, too.

 

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Beaudoin, John
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm

 

I could put some women in front of you and ask you if they’re 8 months pregnant 
or not and you wouldn’t think it’s so obvious.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

 

I don't think that's true.  I think there are obvious guys and non-obvious guys.

It's one or the other.  Like pregnancy.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

There's HAS to be bubbles. Even if you got rid of all the bubble guys you'd 
have a new class of bubble guys.

 

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

Grrr...

No bubble guys!  It's the freaking Hall of Fame, not Hall of 
He-was-really-really-good. 

 

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

As I told Matt, I always tought JER was a bubble guy, but the HOF is filled 
with Bubble Guys so I'm happy to have one of ours in there.

 

Who will be the next Red Sox to enter the hall? Pedro or Manny?



 

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Ralph Sherman <[email protected]> wrote:

Fair enough. And at least it's another Bosox in the HOF.

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Matt & Olga McSorley <mailto:[email protected]>  

        To: [email protected] 

        Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:33 PM

        Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

         

                Well, to be fair, he only played in one World Series. Kind of a 
small sample.

         

        -- Matt
        
        --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Ralph Sherman <[email protected]> wrote:

                
                From: Ralph Sherman <[email protected]>
                Subject: Re: Hmmmmm
                To: [email protected]
                Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 2:10 PM

                Jim Rice elected to the Hall of Fame. On his last at bat.

                 

                Roll the tapes of his World Series performances. Ahh, the home 
runs. The RBIs. The...MIA status.

                        ----- Original Message ----- 

                        From: Steve Ouellette 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>  

                        To: [email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>  

                        Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:07 PM

                        Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

                         

                        Yeah, but they're trading him because he won't move off 
SS--and who can blame him, he just earned a fraudulent Gold Glove--so we'd have 
to play him there or incur his wrath. And he's signed through age 37.
                        
                        Steve O

                        On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley 
<[email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > wrote:

                                                I know but I'm thinking about a 
season with Lowrie/Lugo at short, and the likelihood that one or all of Drew, 
Lowell, Ortiz won't get through the season without getting hurt, and what an 
extra bat could do in the lineup. He's 32 and his defense is poor. They'd 
probably have to give up too much to get him. And he doesn't provide that much 
power. Still....

                         

                        Hmmm....

                         

                        
                        
                        --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Steve Ouellette 
<[email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > wrote:

                                
                                From: Steve Ouellette <[email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
                                Subject: Re: Hmmmmm
                                To: [email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
                                Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:59 PM 

                                 

                                Just say no Matt.

                                On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Matt & Olga 
McSorley <[email protected] 
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > wrote:

                                                                That's all I'll 
say. Hmmmmm......

                                 


                                Young angered by changing position


                                 

                                Associated Press

                                The Texas Rangers 
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=tex>  are exploring trade options 
for five-time All-Star shortstop Michael Young 
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4566>  at the player's 
request after he became upset about the team's plan to move him to third base.

                                Rangers general manager Jon Daniels said Sunday 
night during a hastily called conference call that the team has looked into 
trade possibilities but remains hopeful Young will remain in Texas.

                                "Our desire is for Michael to play third base," 
Daniels said. "Obviously though, he's got to buy into what we're doing."

                                The Rangers would like to move Young to third 
to make room for highly touted prospect Elvis Andrus at shortstop. The 
20-year-old Andrus came to Texas in July 2007 in the trade that sent Mark 
Teixeira <http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4937>  to 
Atlanta.

                                Daniels said he and manager Ron Washington met 
with the 32-year-old Young last month about the direction of the team and 
moving to third base.

                                "Reluctant, reluctant," Daniels said, 
describing Young's reaction. "He explained to us that he's worked extremely 
hard to make himself a shortstop. Obviously in 2004, he volunteered to move 
from second base to shortstop. That kind of shows the team-first character that 
has been a stable of his personality and really has made himself an outstanding 
player."

                                Daniels said he hasn't spoken to Young since 
before New Year's Day, but has had conversations with the player's agent.

                                Young switched from second base to shortstop in 
the spring of 2004 after the Rangers traded Alex Rodriguez 
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=3115>  to the New York 
Yankees <http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=nyy> . Rodriguez moved 
from shortstop to third to accommodate that trade.

                                Young has been selected to the All-Star team as 
a shortstop every season since, and last year earned his first AL Gold Glove 
award.

                                He is a career .300 hitter, though his streak 
of five consecutive 200-hit seasons was snapped in 2008 when he was hampered by 
a fractured right ring finger the last two months of the season. He was the AL 
batting champion in 2005 when he hit .331.

                                Young next season begins the five-year, $80 
million contract extension he signed during spring training in 2007 that 
prevented him from becoming a free agent. Young is due about $62 million over 
the next five seasons since some of the money was paid as a signing bonus and 
more is deferred.

                                That contract was second-largest in team 
history, behind only the $252 million, 10-year contract Rodriguez got in 
December 2000.

                                Young, a minor leaguer when traded from Toronto 
to Texas in 2000, is the Rangers' longest-tenured player. He played in two 
games that season and then 106 as a rookie in 2001.

                                Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press

                                        
                                 

                                        

                                                                                
 

                                
                         

                                

                                         

                

 

 

 

 









--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to