I don't agree.

Yaz was more of a threat in his younger days when we never had the
chance to see him.

Compared to his peers of the day, he rose above them all.

Jim Rice did not rise above them all during his day.  How many batting
titles?  Where did he rank in HR's each year?  I don't know the answers,
but I'd like to know where he ranked in various categories during his
years versus Yaz's same number of years from beginning to the total
years Rice made it to.

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Marino
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 6:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

 

If you were starting a team and had to pick one retired Red Sox
leftfielder (and say Ted Williams wasn't available because his head was
in a freezer)an it is Rice, hands down.  Agree or not?



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Jan 12 18:14:25 2009
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm

Different days.

Yaz played during the very low ERA days.  The year after his triple
crown was 1968.  And read this from Wikipedia:

"Yastrzemski's .301 mark in "The Year of the Pitcher" is the lowest
average of any batting champion in major league history; however, he was
the only hitter in the American League to hit .300 for that season
against such formidable pitching"



That's why you can't compare stats in different times.

Your argument means nothing.

Jim Rice didn't debut 'til '75, right?

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Marino
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm



Never even sure why it was a debate about Rice.  Compared to Yaz.  Rice:
Life time average: .298.  HR: 382 in 12 seasons (an average of 32 per
season).  Yaz: Life time average: .285.  HR 452 in 23 seasons (an
average of 19 per season).  Rice was a better hitter and had much more
power.  Yes, Yaz won the Triple Crown and was an excellent defender
(better at first base than in left field), but it always struck me that
Yza got too much credit for longevity and Rice got too much slack for
the lack of it.  In his day, Rice was simply one of the most feared
hitters in both leagues.  If Yaz belongs in the HOF, Rice does, too.







________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beaudoin, John
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hmmmmm



I could put some women in front of you and ask you if they're 8 months
pregnant or not and you wouldn't think it's so obvious.



________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hmmmmm



I don't think that's true.  I think there are obvious guys and
non-obvious guys.

It's one or the other.  Like pregnancy.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

There's HAS to be bubbles. Even if you got rid of all the bubble guys
you'd have a new class of bubble guys.



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

Grrr...

No bubble guys!  It's the freaking Hall of Fame, not Hall of
He-was-really-really-good.



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

As I told Matt, I always tought JER was a bubble guy, but the HOF is
filled with Bubble Guys so I'm happy to have one of ours in there.



Who will be the next Red Sox to enter the hall? Pedro or Manny?





On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Ralph Sherman
<[email protected]> wrote:

Fair enough. And at least it's another Bosox in the HOF.

        ----- Original Message -----

        From: Matt & Olga McSorley <mailto:[email protected]> 

        To: [email protected]

        Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:33 PM

        Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

        

                Well, to be fair, he only played in one World Series.
Kind of a small sample.

        

        -- Matt
       
        --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Ralph Sherman <[email protected]>
wrote:

               
                From: Ralph Sherman <[email protected]>
                Subject: Re: Hmmmmm
                To: [email protected]
                Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 2:10 PM

                Jim Rice elected to the Hall of Fame. On his last at
bat.

                

                Roll the tapes of his World Series performances. Ahh,
the home runs. The RBIs. The...MIA status.

                        ----- Original Message -----

                        From: Steve Ouellette
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 

                        To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=redsoxcitiz...@googlegroup
s.com> 

                        Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:07 PM

                        Subject: Re: Hmmmmm

                        

                        Yeah, but they're trading him because he won't
move off SS--and who can blame him, he just earned a fraudulent Gold
Glove--so we'd have to play him there or incur his wrath. And he's
signed through age 37.
                       
                        Steve O

                        On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Matt & Olga
McSorley <[email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
wrote:

                                                I know but I'm thinking
about a season with Lowrie/Lugo at short, and the likelihood that one or
all of Drew, Lowell, Ortiz won't get through the season without getting
hurt, and what an extra bat could do in the lineup. He's 32 and his
defense is poor. They'd probably have to give up too much to get him.
And he doesn't provide that much power. Still....

                        

                        Hmmm....

                        

                       
                       
                        --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Steve Ouellette
<[email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
wrote:

                               
                                From: Steve Ouellette
<[email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
                                Subject: Re: Hmmmmm
                                To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=redsoxcitiz...@googlegroup
s.com>
                                Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:59 PM

                                

                                Just say no Matt.

                                On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Matt &
Olga McSorley <[email protected]
<http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
wrote:

                                                                That's
all I'll say. Hmmmmm......

                                


                                Young angered by changing position


                                

                                Associated Press

                                The Texas Rangers
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=tex>  are exploring trade
options for five-time All-Star shortstop Michael Young
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4566>  at the
player's request after he became upset about the team's plan to move him
to third base.

                                Rangers general manager Jon Daniels said
Sunday night during a hastily called conference call that the team has
looked into trade possibilities but remains hopeful Young will remain in
Texas.

                                "Our desire is for Michael to play third
base," Daniels said. "Obviously though, he's got to buy into what we're
doing."

                                The Rangers would like to move Young to
third to make room for highly touted prospect Elvis Andrus at shortstop.
The 20-year-old Andrus came to Texas in July 2007 in the trade that sent
Mark Teixeira
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4937>  to
Atlanta.

                                Daniels said he and manager Ron
Washington met with the 32-year-old Young last month about the direction
of the team and moving to third base.

                                "Reluctant, reluctant," Daniels said,
describing Young's reaction. "He explained to us that he's worked
extremely hard to make himself a shortstop. Obviously in 2004, he
volunteered to move from second base to shortstop. That kind of shows
the team-first character that has been a stable of his personality and
really has made himself an outstanding player."

                                Daniels said he hasn't spoken to Young
since before New Year's Day, but has had conversations with the player's
agent.

                                Young switched from second base to
shortstop in the spring of 2004 after the Rangers traded Alex Rodriguez
<http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=3115>  to the
New York Yankees <http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=nyy> .
Rodriguez moved from shortstop to third to accommodate that trade.

                                Young has been selected to the All-Star
team as a shortstop every season since, and last year earned his first
AL Gold Glove award.

                                He is a career .300 hitter, though his
streak of five consecutive 200-hit seasons was snapped in 2008 when he
was hampered by a fractured right ring finger the last two months of the
season. He was the AL batting champion in 2005 when he hit .331.

                                Young next season begins the five-year,
$80 million contract extension he signed during spring training in 2007
that prevented him from becoming a free agent. Young is due about $62
million over the next five seasons since some of the money was paid as a
signing bonus and more is deferred.

                                That contract was second-largest in team
history, behind only the $252 million, 10-year contract Rodriguez got in
December 2000.

                                Young, a minor leaguer when traded from
Toronto to Texas in 2000, is the Rangers' longest-tenured player. He
played in two games that season and then 106 as a rookie in 2001.

                                Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press

                                       
                                

                                       

 


                               
                        

                               

                                        

               





















--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to