It's more likely the voters subscribed to the ridiculous principle that NO ONE should be elected unanimously.
Morons On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah. I guess that's where it comes back to the "If I had a vote" > situation. So I'd say the person would have to be obvious to me. Any > counter argument in my mind and he wouldn't get my vote. > > 28 voters didn't feel that way? Idiots. Or I wonder if they wanted > to use their votes on less obvious choices, figuring the other writers > would do the right thing. > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Steve Ouellette > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Obvious in whose opinion? Ricky Henderson is obvious, but 28 voters > didn't > > feel that way, so is he not obvious? > > > > Steve O > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> And thus my point is made, because nobody would claim that Koufax > doesn't > >> belong. So I still contend that there are players that are obvious and > >> those are the only ones that should be in. > >> > >> If the player is not obvious, then they are out. > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
