Yeah. I guess that's where it comes back to the "If I had a vote" situation. So I'd say the person would have to be obvious to me. Any counter argument in my mind and he wouldn't get my vote.
28 voters didn't feel that way? Idiots. Or I wonder if they wanted to use their votes on less obvious choices, figuring the other writers would do the right thing. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]> wrote: > Obvious in whose opinion? Ricky Henderson is obvious, but 28 voters didn't > feel that way, so is he not obvious? > > Steve O > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And thus my point is made, because nobody would claim that Koufax doesn't >> belong. So I still contend that there are players that are obvious and >> those are the only ones that should be in. >> >> If the player is not obvious, then they are out. >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
