I'm saying that their chances of scoring from the 30 with 2 minutes to go is 50%
and the chances of stopping the Pats was 60%. So the odds of the Colts winning was 30%. I'm OK with that. Ray On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote: > You guys are really drinking the Belichek Kool-aid. Are you really > telling me that the chances of Manning scoring from the Colts 30 with no > time outs are equal to that of them scoring on the Pats 30 under the same > conditions? No matter how you slice it, it was a bad call. It cost the > Patriots home field advantage in the playoffs, which can be the difference > in a Superbowl drive. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi > *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2009 8:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Football Numbers > > Steve O has cleverly summed up my numbers approach > > It seems to make sense that the Patriots had a much better chance of making >> two yards than they had of stopping the Colts. >> > > I bow to his explanatory powers! > > > > -- Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 Weeks" www.leadingafteralayoff.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
