I saw the PI call only once in realtime.  Looked strange to me that
there was even a call.  Was there a push-off prior to the ball arriving?
I don't get that.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Ouellette
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 1:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Football Numbers

 

First, they still had one timeout, plus the two minute warning. And
second, you must have missed the previous drive where they went through
the Patriots like a hot knife through butter (albeit helped by a bogus
30-yard pass interference call) in less than two minutes, using no
timeouts. 

Steve O




On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:

OK, Since we're talking about imaginary numbers....

 

I think your estimate is a little on the low side, but for the sake of
argument I will give it to you.  I think the Colts have a less than 30%
chance of scoring with no time outs if we kick it away.  

 

Any other coach in the league would be in danger of being fired today
after that call.

        
________________________________


        From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi

        Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 11:08 AM

        
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Football Numbers

         

        I'm saying that their chances of scoring from the 30 with 2
minutes to go is 50%
        
        and the chances of stopping the Pats was 60%.
        
        So the odds of the Colts winning was 30%.
        
        I'm OK with that.
        
        Ray
        
        

        On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]>
wrote:

        You guys are really drinking the Belichek Kool-aid.  Are you
really telling me that the chances of Manning scoring from the Colts 30
with no time outs are equal to that of them scoring on the Pats 30 under
the same conditions?  No matter how you slice it, it was a bad call.  It
cost the Patriots home field advantage in the playoffs, which can be the
difference in a Superbowl drive.  

                
________________________________


                From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi

                Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:45 AM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: Re: Football Numbers

                Steve O has cleverly summed up my numbers approach

                It seems to make sense that the Patriots had a much
better chance of making two yards than they had of stopping the Colts.

                
                I bow to his explanatory powers!

                 

        
        
        
        -- 
        Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's
Productivity in Just 12 Weeks"
        www.leadingafteralayoff.com
        
        
        





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to