I ve been watching   , this discussion  on  antennii  for   repeaters ,and i
want to throw  my 2  cents  in ,  the  feb hamfest  in the area     my room
mate  and i picked up a workman uvs-300  for  $55 , its the same antenna  as
the  diamond  XMa-510   , 11.3 db on 440 and 8.5 db on 144 ,  and so far
we have thrown up to 50 watts  uhf into it and  have  worked  440 machines
about 100 miles away , and  i live a the  base of a  mount , block  3  3/4
sides  of  line of sight ,  thisis a  hell of an antenna !!! , 2  meter was
even more  impressive   , it can hear a  30 watt repeater   26 miles  away
through solid rock !!!,  my feed line is   50 ' of  cheap rg 58 , , now
heres the impressive  part , we  have a GE progress line  uhf repeater ,
and it had a bad  TX strip , it puts out about 3/4 to 1 watt into a  phelps
dodge duplexer , and well that eats power , and still feeding the antenna
with the same rg 58  , the  out put   after the cans is   milliwatts  ,and
feed  milliwatts through  rg 58 , i know stupid ,  that repeater   with that
uvs  300 antenna , has a 9 mile  talk range  to mobles in the hills and
base  radios  at almost 12 miles , on Milliwatts!!!!!!!! ,    i recomend
this dual band  base antenna  to anyone   , i know it hanst had a  popular
review , but  i still bout one and  it has  out done   any  antenna  i have
built  or purchased  hands down , so if your  looking for  range  on a  low
power  setup , thisis ur way to go!!!

Workman UVS -300
200 Watt  Capicity
239 mount  , not an N unfortunately
17.6 ft  tall  3 piece  fibre glass
adjustable  ground plain sleeve

available  from
The Ham Shop
syracuse NY  315-466-2604

i hope this will  help in  anyones  ideas  for repeater or base antennii

Russ
N3TIH

----- Original Message -----
From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:32 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Ringos, Diamond, Comet & Hustler Antennas


> We are using Ringo Antennas for both Commercial and
> Amateur Applications right now, they work just
> fine for us.
>
> Have you ever measured the bandwidth of the Comet or
> Diamond Antennas?
>
> Most (of at least the Multiband) Antennas are quite narrow
> in bandwidth and don't make the entire 440-450 Amateur
> band with usable reflected power values. They are also not
> nearly as hardy in construction.
>
> The Hustler Dual Band antenna I measured a month ago
> would not be commercially usable for a repeater site.
>
> Like the Comet/Diamond Multiband the bandwidth was
> to small and non adjustable. The mono band Hustlers
> are quite nice, I've just installed a new pair to
> replace a high preformance commercial antenna array
> and they actually out preform the original Decibel
> commercial antenna system.
>
> The Hustler mono band Antennas are quite hardy, I don't
> have a problem installing them at commercial repeater
> sites.  I no longer install most of the Comet and
> Diamond antennas, the high winds blow and shake them
> into failure mode within a few years. A large bird
> flew into one 1296 Comet I had up and broke it off
> at the base (never did find the bird...)  If you live
> where the wind doesn't blow hard, they will probably
> hold up well for some years.
>
> The proof is in the overall preformance. Ringos remain
> good preformers for some of my commercial and Amateur
> applications.
>
> cheers
> skipp
> www.radiowrench.com
>
> > Eric Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stay away from the Ringo's for Repeater use! This was
> > a poor choice of antenna! I would highly recomend
> > looking at the Dimmond products. I have had very good
> > luck using them on repeaters. Besides you get more
> > peformance form them than a Hustler g144-6.
> >
> > 73's and good luck!
> >
> > Eric (N7JYS)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to