On Sep 1, 2007, at 4:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We have control of the technical operating parameters; see Part > 97.3 (a)(22). > > As an example, we have one system on test coordination that has ~20 > dB of > desense. It can't be used anywhere with an HT, even 5 miles away & > line-of-sight. If this isn't corrected by the end of the test > period, the > test will expire & it will revert to uncoordinated status
I'll take your word for Part 97... we've just never had any technical limitations in our coordination body out here that would require a certain quality of gear (or performance)... what a fight THAT would be... What we HAVE seen is site leases that require it... keeping most of the "riff-raff" junk off the high sites, where it'd be the most problematic. >> At least if the other repeater was on a different tone, they'd >> have more >> "protection" from the dummy doing their repeater wrong blaming the >> GOOD >> system for problems. > > Again, that's of no concern to me as a "good" system operator. I > wouldn't > want to make my system harder to find to cater to the lid. I was thinking more in terms that any lid building a machine THAT bad wouldn't even know HOW to find the interference, let alone whether or not it was from the other system (which is working properly/normally and nothing is wrong with it)... -- Nate Duehr, WY0X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
