Hi Joe, 

I don't have all the model numbers recorded... so a picture 
of the unit says a thousand words mucho betta'. 

I'll email you a picture to indicate if this is the unit 
you have...  take this off the group. 

cheers, 
skipp 

> Joe <k1ike_m...@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Skipp,
> 
> The combiner in this rack is a Celwave TJD220-5T and there is another 
> number on the rack, Model 720160 (forgot where this was located on the 
> equipment).  My goal is to come up with a plan for a 222mhz duplexer
for 
> a friend's linking project.  I shouldn't have sold my 222 repeater
after 
> all, but that's the way it always goes.  You need something after you 
> sell it.  It looks like there are enough cans to make something
work.  I 
> was thinking 2 pass cans and 1 notch can on each side.  6 cans in
all, I 
> just have to experiment with the connecting cable lengths.  This
will be 
> a low powered linking repeater, so duplexer losses will not be a big
issue.
> 
> We can take it private, but others may be interested?
> 
> 73, Joe, K1ike
> 
> The GLB is in the mail, Priority yesterday 12/30/08
> 
> skipp025 wrote:
> > Hi Joe, 
> >
> > I have a large number of the Securicor, Intek 220MHz ACSB 
> > trunking combiners removed from service here on the West 
> > Coast (California). T'was at one time quite the build-out... 
> > going from Texas up through Alaska. 
> >
> > At first glance it appears least one of almost every antenna 
> > combiner manufacture produced their own version of the 5 channel 
> > combiners for the various incarnations of 220MHz Trunking.
> > However, there are/were other size trunking systems... I have 
> > also seen and worked with two and three channel TX combiners. 
> >
> > So I have Wacom, Cellwave, Aerial Systems, RJ, Telewave, Sinclair 
> > and a few other custom made configurations here. And there are 
> > different variations of combiner systems made by the various 
> > manufactures. It's very interesting to see how different people 
> > accomplished the same task with fairly similar and different 
> > hardware layouts. 
> >
> > So what is most practical to do with what you have depends on 
> > what specific hardware you received.  In most cases it's well 
> > worth your time to try and track this stuff down... lots of 
> > the hardware found in the combiner translates to use in other 
> > applications.  
> >
> > Specific to the Cellwave hardware you have... depends on what 
> > you have. Some of the Cavities are set for pre-selection insertion 
> > loss, some are set for one frequency notch. Some cavities have 
> > semi fixed loops/probes that are hard to work with... and then 
> > there's the easily adjusted bottles. 
> >
> > I measured and made actual performance graphs for the Cellwave 
> > version... so email me direct if you would like to talk more 
> > about it off the list. 
> >
> > I'm using a number of the original as-built TX Combiners at 
> > various mountain top sites. They simply needed minor modifications 
> > and re-tuning. Some of the combiners racks (like a number of 
> > the Cellwave units I have) include receiver pre-selection. In 
> > many cases the receiver pre-selection will work for low power 
> > systems but is really not enough for 2 or more high powered 
> > transmitters in the typical close spaced Amateur Ap. 
> >
> > The Aerial Systems Square Cavities mentioned in dcflux's post are 
> > really, really nice units with relatively much high Q compared to 
> > slightly smaller round cavities. But they are cumbersome to mount 
> > if you don't have the original mfgrs rack rails. 
> >
> > I can post information and hints here if people are interested 
> > but it's probably more practical to yak off the list. Please 
> > feel free to (send food) email me direct. 
> >
> > cheers, 
> > skipp 
> >
> > skipp025 at yahoo.com 
> >
> >
> >   
> >> Joe <k1ike_mail@> wrote:
> >> I have an opportunity to get a combiner/filter panel from a 
> >> 220-222Mhz ACSSB system that was abandoned years ago.  Has 
> >> anyone experimented with making a 222Mhz duplexer out of 
> >> the parts in the Celwave rack that was used in this system?
> >> 73, Joe, K1ike
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to